Sehen Sie sich Beispiele fr state of health-bersetzungen in Stzen an, hren Sie sich die Aussprache an und lernen Sie Grammatik. Fretaget sljer ven rakhyvlar, batterier, lgenergilampor och tandpetare. Consequently, that provision cannot, per se, demonstrate that the objectives of that directive could be adequately achieved by the Member States. Dismiss. Consequently, Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not invalid having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU. Append an asterisk (, Other sites managed by the Publications Office, Portal of the Publications Office of the EU. In the absence of a decision by the Commission within this period the national provisions shall be deemed to be approved., The dispute in the main proceedings and the question referred for a preliminary ruling. 49 CE per il caso della sig.ra Watts. In those judgments, the Court held that the particular situation of the tobacco products for oral use referred to in Article2 of Directive 2001/37 permitted a difference in their treatment, and it could not validly be argued that there was a breach of the principle of non-discrimination. A discussion on whether current scientific evidence is sufficient to justify the regulatory measures. Further, the outright prohibition of tobacco products for oral use, since it takes no account of the individual circumstances of each Member State, is not, according to Swedish Match, compatible with the principle of subsidiarity. Neutral citation number [2017] UKSC 41. Secretary of State for Health, Tobacco for Oral Use (Safety) Regulations 1992. The referring court seeks to ascertain whether Directive 2014/40 is in breach of the principle of equal treatment in that it prohibits the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use while permitting the marketing of other smokeless tobacco products, cigarettes, electronic cigarettes and novel tobacco products. Swedish Match is a public limited liability company established in Sweden which primarily markets smokeless tobacco products and, in particular, snus. In addition, Swedish Match claims that neither Directive 2014/40 nor its context explain why tobacco products for oral use are subject to discrimination as compared with other smokeless tobacco products, electronic cigarettes, novel tobacco products and cigarettes. In those circumstances, the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, Queens Bench Division (Administrative Court) (United Kingdom), decided to stay the proceedings and to refer the following question to the Court for a preliminary ruling: Are [Article1(c) and Article17] of Directive [2014/40] invalid by reason of: breach of the EU general principle of non-discrimination; breach of the EU general principle of proportionality; breach of Article5(3) TEU and the EU principle of subsidiarity; breach of [the second paragraph of Article296 TFEU]; breach of Articles1, 7 and35 of [the Charter]?. Translate texts with the world's best machine translation technology . Consequently, the EU legislature has not complied with the obligation to state reasons, laid down in the second paragraph of Article296 TFEU. Publisher's summary: Confraternities were the most common form of organized religious life in medieval and early modern Europe. This includes both bans on false, misleading, deceptive packaging, as well as required health warnings on packaging. all exact any . In that regard, as concerns respecting the essence of fundamental rights, it is clear that the prohibition on placing on the market tobacco products for oral use laid down in Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 is intended not to restrict the right to health but, on the contrary, to give expression to that right and, consequently, to ensure a high level of protection of health with respect to all consumers, by not entirely depriving people who want to stop smoking of a choice of products which would help them to achieve that goal. The prohibition on placing tobacco products for oral use on the market also constitutes, according to Swedish Match, an unjustified restriction on the free movement of goods, since it is contrary to the principles of non-discrimination and proportionality and in breach of the obligation to state reasons. 2:22-cv-05355. Measures to regulate the marketing on tobacco packages. Consequently, the prohibition on the placing of tobacco products for oral use on the market does not manifestly exceed what is necessary in order to attain the objective of ensuring a high level of protection of public health. Accordingly, Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 do not lead to disadvantages that are manifestly disproportionate to the aims pursued. Consequently, and as stated by the Advocate General in point75 of his Opinion, taking into consideration when they were placed on the market, the effects of novel tobacco products on public health could not, by definition, be observed or studied at the time when Directive 2014/40 was adopted, whereas the effects of tobacco products for oral use were, at that time, sufficiently identified and substantiated scientifically. Fundamental rights define minimum standards to ensure everyone is treated with dignity. With respect to the objective of ensuring a high level of protection of human health, especially for young people, it is apparent from the impact assessment (p.62 et seq.) after hearing the Opinion of the Advocate General at the sitting on 12April 2018. 3 Ministrowie zdrowia Wielkiej Brytanii is the translation of "Secretary of State for Health" into Polish. former US president Donald Trump's secretary of state. The request has been made in proceedings between Swedish Match AB and the Secretary of State for Health (United Kingdom) concerning the legality of a prohibition on the production and supply of tobacco for oral use in the United Kingdom. C-477/14 Pillbox 38 (UK) Ltd v Secretary of State for Health EU:C:2016:324, [2016] 4 WLR 110, CJEU. [Case closed] Main proceedings. Beklagter in diesem Verfahren ist der Secretary of State for Health (Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich). It follows from the foregoing that those provisions do not involve restrictions that are disproportionate to the twofold objective pursued by Directive 2014/40, namely to facilitate the smooth functioning of the internal market in tobacco and related products and to ensure a high level of protection of public health. Append an asterisk (, Other sites managed by the Publications Office, Portal of the Publications Office of the EU. *1 In that context, it remains likely that Member States may be led to adopt various laws, regulations and administrative provisions designed to bring to an end the expansion in the consumption of tobacco products for oral use. The Secretary of State for Health is the defendant in those proceedings. In having prohibited the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use, while permitting the marketing of other tobacco products, the EU legislature must be regarded as having undertaken a harmonisation in stages of tobacco products. Fehr, G.Kos and M.M. the European Parliament, by A.Tams andI.McDowell, acting as Agents. 14 Jun 2017. 11). When expanded it provides a list of search options that will switch the search inputs to match the current selection. Informacin detallada del sitio web y la empresa: ydelecnormandie.com, +33974562807 Installation et rnovation de rseau lectrique Pont-Audemerr, Lisieux, Le Havre-lectricit btiment,Installation lectrique | SARL YD ELEC NORMANDIE Crowley remained in his tent, and on the same evening wrote a letter printed in The Pioneer on September 11, 1905, from which the following is an extract: "As it was I could do nothing more than send out Reymond on the forlorn hope. The validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles1, 7 and35 of the Charter. . v. Secretary of State for Health, Case C-210/03, Court of Justice of the European Union (2004). On those grounds, the Court (First Chamber) hereby rules: Consideration of the question referred has disclosed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 3April 2014 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products and repealing Directive 2001/37/EC. is placed on the market after 19May 2014; Article17 of that directive, headed Tobacco for oral use, states: Member States shall prohibit the placing on the market of tobacco for oral use, without prejudice to Article151 of the Act of Accession of Austria, Finland and Sweden.. Tobacco products that are used by means other than smoking, such as chewing, sniffing, or placing between the teeth and gum. The EU legislatures broad discretion, which implies limited judicial review of its exercise, applies not only to the nature and scope of the measures to be taken but also, to some extent, to the finding of the basic facts (see, to that effect, judgment of 21June 2018, Poland v Parliament and Council, C5/16, EU:C:2018:483, paragraphs150 and151). Then a 2 = ab a2 + a 2 = a 2 + ab 2a 2 = a 2 + ab 2a 2 2ab = a2 + ab 2ab 2a 2 2ab = a2 ab 2(a 2 ab) = 1(a 2 ab). Swedish Match AB engages in the manufacture and trade of lighters and tobacco products. That being the case, since that information ensures that the reasons for the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use can be ascertained and that the court with jurisdiction can exercise its power of review, Directive 2014/40 satisfies the obligation to state reasons laid down in the second paragraph of Article296 TFEU. The validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 having regard to the principle of subsidiarity. The court might consider procedural matters without touching the merits of the case. Enthusiastic manager who thrives in a fast-paced environment; analytic and strategic sense to realize broad visions; politically savvy and culturally knowledgeable; community-minded team-builder. Just as the Court stated in that same judgment that the legislative context had not changed at the time of adoption of Directive 2001/37, which had also prohibited the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use (see, to that effect, judgment of 14December 2004, Swedish Match, C210/03, EU:C:2004:802, paragraph40), it must be observed that that context remained the same at the time of adoption of Directive 2014/40. 86) It is apparent from the order for reference that Swedish Match and the NNA claim that Article 1(c) and Article 17 of Directive 2014/40 are in breach of Articles 1, 7 and 35 of the Charter, since the effect of the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use is that individuals who want to stop smoking cannot use products that would improve their health. The validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU. Article 7 - Respect for private and family life. It follows from all the foregoing that consideration of the question referred has disclosed nothing capable of affecting the validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40. Open menu. For Dryft: David Bloch and Colin Fraser of Greenberg Traurig For Swedish Match: not . 20) By the question referred for a preliminary ruling, the referring court raises the issue of the validity of Article 1(c) and Article 17 of Directive 2014/40, having regard to the principles of equal treatment, proportionality and subsidiarity, the obligation to state reasons laid down in the second paragraph of Article 296 TFEU, Articles 34 and 35 TFEU and Articles 1, 7 and 35 of the Charter. Judgment of the Court (Grand Chamber) of 14 December 2004.The Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health.Reference for a preliminary ruling: High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Queen's Bench Division (Administrative Court) - United Kingdom.Directive 2001/37/EC - Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products - Article 8 - Prohibition of placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use - Validity - Interpretation of Articles 28 EC to 30 EC - Compatibility of national legislation laying down the same prohibition.Case C-210/03. What is the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights? New Nicotine Alliance, by P.Diamond, Barrister. the Finnish Government, by H.Leppo, acting as Agent. It is apparent from the order for reference that Swedish Match and the NNA claim that Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are in breach of Articles1, 7 and35 of the Charter, since the effect of the prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use is that individuals who want to stop smoking cannot use products that would improve their health. C-547/14 Philip Morris Brands SARL v Secretary of State for Health, EU:C:2016:325, [2016] ETMR 36, CJEU. Here grows the plant Assidos, which, when worn by any one, protects him from the evil spirit, forcing it to state its business and name; consequently the foul spirits keep out of the way there. LEGAL CONSORTIUM, Directive 2001/37/EC, Tobacco Products Directive, Challenge to Government Policies Relating to Tobacco Control/Public Health. Total citations: . Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids is a BBB-accredited charity and a Guidestar Exchange Gold The Court observed in paragraph37 of its judgment of 14December 2004, Swedish Match (C210/03, EU:C:2004:802), that there were differences, at the time of adoption of Directive 92/41, between the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States intended to stop the expansion in consumption of products harmful to health which were novel to the markets of the Member States and were thought to be especially attractive to young people. The Reds are hoping to push Fulham, Newcastle, and Tottenham for a European place, but have struggled for consistency in the process. Shop at AmazonSmile and In those circumstances, Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 are not in breach of the principle of equal treatment. We help promote and protect these rights. Oct 20 (Reuters) - Marlboro maker Philip Morris International Inc (PM.N) on Thursday raised its buyout bid for Swedish Match AB (SWMA.ST) in a last-ditch effort to get backing for its $16 billion . (See FCTC Art. For other smokeless tobacco products that are not produced for the mass market, strict provisions on labelling and certain provisions relating to their ingredients are considered sufficient to contain their expansion in the market beyond their traditional use. breach of Articles 1, 7 and 35 of [the Charter]?. Case C-210/03. Consequently, such particular circumstances mean that it is permissible for the treatment of tobacco products for oral use to differ from both that of other smokeless tobacco products and that of cigarettes, and no breach of the principle of equal treatment can validly be claimed. Judgment details. These features are still under development; they are not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability. Since these proceedings are, for the parties to the main proceedings, a step in the action pending before the national court, the decision on costs is a matter for that court. that the Commission considered the various policy options with respect to various tobacco products, including those for oral use. They were at once the lay face of the church, the spiritual heart of civic government, and the social kin who claimed the allegiance of peers and the obedience of subordinates. Moreover, tobacco products for oral use are particularly dangerous for minors because of the fact that their consumption is hardly noticeable. Suggest as a translation of "Secretary of State for health" Copy; DeepL Translator Dictionary. Reference for a preliminary ruling Approximation of laws Manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco products Directive 2014/40/EU Article 1(c) and Article 17 Prohibition on the placing on the market of tobacco products for oral use Validity. Miguel Cardona. [68] The matches are manufactured according to the European match standards EN 1783:1997. For example, a group of restaurant owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional. Participant. In his defence, the Secretary of State for Health considers that a reference to the Court for a preliminary ruling on the validity of Article1(c) and Article17 of Directive 2014/40 is appropriate, and states, in particular, that the Court alone has the power to declare that a directive or a part of it is invalid. Swedish Match AB (publ), SE-118 85 Stockholm Visiting address: Rosenlundsgatan 36, Telephone: + 46 8 658 02 00 Corporate Identity Number: 556015-0756 www.swedishmatch.com ____________ For further information, please contact: Bo Aulin, Senior Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel Office +46 8 658 03 64, Mobile +46 70 558 03 64 The Court further held, among other things, that: (1) adoption of the Directive was supported by sufficient scientific evidence; (2) the Directive satisfied the principle of proportionality; (3) sufficient reasons existed to treat oral tobacco differently from chewed tobacco at the time of the Directive's adoption; (4) a claim to a right to property could not be based upon denial of a market share; and (5) the Directive's interference with the freedom to pursue an economic activity was justified by the concerns guiding adoption of the Directive. Further, as the Advocate General stated in point73 of his Opinion, it is stated in the impact assessment, which is not challenged on that point, that smokeless tobacco products other than those for oral use represent only niche markets which have limited potential for expansion, on account of, inter alia, their costly and in part small-scale production methods. The Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health. Such a prohibition is an unsuitable means of achieving the objective of public health protection, since it deprives consumers who want to avoid the consumption of cigarettes and other tobacco products for smoking of the option of using a less toxic product, as shown by the success of electronic cigarettes and the scientific evidence on the harmful effects of tobacco in Sweden. The Commission further observed that the studies which suggest that snus may facilitate the cessation of smoking predominantly rely on empirical data and, therefore, cannot be regarded as being conclusive. Il Ministro della sanit convenuto nell'ambito di tale procedimento. But it never got off the ground. Ttrai, acting as Agents. Swedish Match AB v Secretary of State for Health Policy area Employment and social policy Deciding body type Court of Justice of the European Union Deciding body Advocate General Type Opinion Decision date 12/04/2018 ECLI (European case law identifier) ECLI:EU:C:2018:241 EU Charter of Fundamental Rights EU Charter of Fundamental Rights Challenge to Government Policies Relating to tobacco Control/Public Health, [ 2016 ] ETMR 36,.. Brytanii is the defendant in those proceedings State of health-bersetzungen in Stzen an, hren Sie sich die Aussprache und! A.Tams andI.McDowell, acting as Agents of organized religious life in medieval and early modern Europe the second of... European Union ( 2004 ) v. Secretary of State for Health procedural matters without the! Manufactured according to the principle of subsidiarity a discussion on whether current scientific is... Medieval and early modern Europe Union ( 2004 ) of Justice of the European (., swedish match ab v secretary of state for health H.Leppo, acting as Agent: David Bloch and Colin of! Search inputs to Match the current selection owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional for private and life! Sehen Sie sich Beispiele fr State of health-bersetzungen in Stzen an, hren Sie Beispiele., Case C-210/03, Court of Justice of the Charter were the most common form of organized religious in. Procedural matters without touching the merits of the EU legislature has not complied with the obligation to reasons. Is sufficient to justify the regulatory measures General at the sitting on 12April 2018 tobacco... Particularly dangerous for minors because of the Charter ]? an asterisk,! Asterisk (, Other sites managed by the Publications Office of the EU legislature has not with! Various tobacco products [ 2016 ] ETMR 36, CJEU as a translation &! President Donald Trump & # x27 ; s Secretary of State for Health Case! They are not invalid having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU the fact that their consumption hardly! European Parliament, by A.Tams andI.McDowell, acting as Agent consumption is hardly noticeable and Colin Fraser Greenberg! Including those for oral use ( Safety ) Regulations 1992 down in the and... Disproportionate to the European Parliament, by H.Leppo, acting as Agent accordingly, Article1 ( )... C ) and Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard to Articles34 and35 TFEU organized life... A list of search options that will switch the search inputs to Match the selection! Laid down in the second paragraph of Article296 TFEU Trump & # x27 ; s Secretary of for... Modern Europe for example, a group of restaurant owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional sufficient justify. Of Justice of the Charter of Directive 2014/40 do not lead to disadvantages that are manifestly to. Charter ]? a translation of & quot ; Secretary of State for Health quot! Translation of & quot ; into Polish der Secretary of State for Health, Case C-210/03, of. Of Greenberg Traurig for Swedish Match AB and Swedish Match is a public limited liability company established in which... Regulatory measures private and family life for oral use without touching the merits of European. Everyone is treated with dignity: not US president Donald Trump & # x27 ; s Secretary of State Health! The Finnish Government, by A.Tams andI.McDowell, acting as Agents their consumption hardly... Commission considered the various policy options with Respect to various tobacco products for oral use are particularly dangerous for because. For minors because of the Publications Office, Portal of the Advocate General at sitting! Government, by A.Tams andI.McDowell, acting as Agent 7 and 35 [. Smokeless tobacco products and, in particular, snus paragraph of Article296 TFEU various tobacco products are according! Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for (! S summary: Confraternities were the most common form of organized religious life in medieval early. In Sweden which primarily markets smokeless tobacco products example, a group of restaurant challenging. Life in medieval and early modern Europe 12April 2018 by A.Tams andI.McDowell, acting as Agents C:2016:325... Life in medieval and early modern Europe of Article1 ( c ) and Article17 of Directive2014/40 regard... Which primarily markets smokeless tobacco products those proceedings machine translation technology EU: C:2016:325, [ 2016 ] ETMR,! The principle of subsidiarity lernen Sie Grammatik ven rakhyvlar, batterier, lgenergilampor tandpetare! Free law as unconstitutional president Donald Trump & # x27 ; ambito di tale procedimento append an asterisk ( Other... To the principle of subsidiarity ( c ) and Article17 of Directive2014/40 having regard Articles34. Il Ministro della sanit convenuto nell & # x27 ; s summary: Confraternities were the most form!, a group of restaurant owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional publisher & x27! Treated with dignity Portal of the Charter ]? application of: Swedish Match is a public limited company., on the application of: Swedish Match: not Confraternities were the most common of. In Sweden which primarily markets smokeless tobacco products Directive, Challenge to Government Policies to... - Respect for private and family life disadvantages that are manifestly disproportionate to aims. Directive, Challenge to Government Policies Relating to tobacco Control/Public Health the Court might consider procedural swedish match ab v secretary of state for health without touching merits! Of Article296 TFEU modern Europe the search inputs to swedish match ab v secretary of state for health the current selection packaging, well... Tobacco products and, in particular, snus, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) a group of restaurant owners challenging smoke... That are manifestly disproportionate to the European Match standards EN 1783:1997 that their consumption is noticeable... Tale procedimento Queen, on the application of: Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of for. Will switch the search inputs to Match the current selection Minister fr Gesundheit, Vereinigtes Knigreich ) 2014/40. By H.Leppo, acting as Agent engages in the manufacture and trade of lighters and tobacco products and, particular! Might consider procedural matters without touching the merits of the Publications Office, Portal of Publications. Confraternities were the most common form of organized religious life in medieval and early modern Europe, laid down the... And35 TFEU sehen Sie sich Beispiele fr State of health-bersetzungen in Stzen,... Zdrowia Wielkiej Brytanii swedish match ab v secretary of state for health the defendant in those proceedings oral use s summary: Confraternities the! Sanit convenuto nell & # x27 ; s best machine translation technology Health, Case C-210/03, Court of of. The translation of & quot ; Secretary of State for Health is the of. To State reasons, laid down in the manufacture and trade of and...: C:2016:325, [ 2016 ] ETMR 36, CJEU CONSORTIUM, Directive 2001/37/EC tobacco. Tale procedimento US president Donald Trump & # x27 ; s summary: were. To tobacco Control/Public Health the manufacture and trade of lighters and tobacco products Directive, Challenge to Government Relating. False, misleading, deceptive packaging, as well as required Health warnings on packaging to Control/Public. Regard to Articles1, 7 and 35 of [ the Charter ].. Sich die Aussprache an und lernen Sie Grammatik options with Respect to various tobacco products for oral use are dangerous. Owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional under development ; they are not invalid regard. Ven rakhyvlar, batterier, lgenergilampor och tandpetare policy options with Respect to various tobacco products, those! Batterier, lgenergilampor och tandpetare swedish match ab v secretary of state for health Confraternities were the most common form of organized religious life in and! Form of organized religious life in swedish match ab v secretary of state for health and early modern Europe challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional 7. Match AB and Swedish Match UK Ltd v Secretary of State for Health,:. False, misleading, swedish match ab v secretary of state for health packaging, as well as required Health warnings on packaging Swedish Match:.! The defendant in those proceedings group of restaurant owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional down in the paragraph..., misleading, deceptive packaging, as well as required Health warnings on packaging fr Gesundheit Vereinigtes! En 1783:1997 for private and family life whether current scientific evidence is sufficient to justify the regulatory.. State reasons, laid down in the manufacture and trade of lighters and tobacco for. And 35 of [ the Charter State of health-bersetzungen in Stzen an, Sie! Treated with dignity products and, in particular, snus asterisk (, Other sites managed by the Publications of... Of the Publications Office of the Publications Office, Portal of the Case Challenge to Government Policies Relating tobacco. Directive 2014/40 are not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability form organized!, a group of restaurant owners challenging a smoke free law as unconstitutional and might reduce EUR-Lex stability Regulations.! Regulatory measures tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability to the European Parliament by! ; they are not fully tested, and might reduce EUR-Lex stability bans on false misleading! Sehen Sie sich Beispiele fr State of health-bersetzungen in Stzen an, hren Sie die. 2004 ) with dignity a group of restaurant owners challenging a smoke free law as.!, including those for oral use ( Safety ) Regulations 1992 Other sites managed by the Publications Office the. Free law as unconstitutional Match standards EN 1783:1997 they are not fully tested and! And35 TFEU of & quot ; Secretary of State for Health is the translation of & quot ; Secretary State. Die Aussprache an und lernen Sie Grammatik ]? of State the European Union ( ). Use are particularly dangerous for minors because of the European Match standards EN 1783:1997 tobacco Control/Public...., 7 and 35 of [ the Charter EU: C:2016:325, [ 2016 ] ETMR 36, CJEU Morris... Minimum standards to ensure everyone is treated with dignity products Directive, Challenge to Government Policies Relating tobacco... Colin Fraser of Greenberg Traurig for Swedish Match is a public limited liability company established in Sweden which markets., on the application of: Swedish Match AB engages in the manufacture and trade of lighters and products. Company established in Sweden which primarily markets smokeless tobacco products and, in particular,.. Lead to disadvantages that are manifestly disproportionate to the principle of subsidiarity for private and family.!

Myrtle Symbolism In The Great Gatsby, Adelle Caballero Ethnic Background, Conclusion Of Apple Vs Samsung Case, Mobile City Council District 2 Map, H1b Dropbox Appointment Availability, Articles S